From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Coppola v. Smith

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, FRESNO DIVISION
Apr 16, 2012
Case No. 1:11-cv-01257-AWI-BAM (E.D. Cal. Apr. 16, 2012)

Opinion

Case No. 1:11-cv-01257-AWI-BAM

04-16-2012

VIOLA COPPOLA, GARY COPPOLA, and THE TRUST OF ANTHONY M. COPPOLA, Plaintiffs, v. GREGORY SMITH, an individual, RICHARD LASTER, an individual, JANE NASH AS TRUSTEE OF THE JANE HIGGINS NASH TRUST, JANE NASH AS EXECUTOR OF THE ESTATE OF DECATUR HIGGINS A/K/A THE ESTATE OF MABEL ELAINE HIGGINS, Defendants. GREGORY SMITH, individually, and doing business as PARAGON CLEANERS, Counter-Complainant and Cross-Complainant, v. VIOLA COPPOLA, GARY COPPOLA, THE TRUST OF ANTHONY M. COPPOLA, JANE HIGGINS NASH, AS TRUSTEE OF THE TRUST IN THE ESTATE OF MABEL ELAINE HIGGINS, Deceased, A/K/A THE TRUST IN THE ESTATE OF MABEL ELAINE HIGGINS, Deceased Counter-Defendants and Cross-Defendants. THE JANE HIGGINS NASH TRUST, Cross-Complainant, v. GREGORY SMITH, RICHARD LASTER, and DOES 1-100, inclusive, Cross-Defendants.


ORDER GRANTING LEAVE TO FILE AMENDED ANSWER

Based on the Stipulation of the parties (Doc. 32), and good cause shown, the Court orders that Defendant Gregory Smith be allowed to file DEFENDANT GREGORY SMITH'S FIRST AMENDED (1) ANSWER TO AMENDED COMPLAINT; (2) COUNTERCLAIMS AGAINST PLAINTIFFS; (3) CROSS-CLAIMS AGAINST OTHER DEFENDANTS; and, (4) DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL. The Court further orders that (1) the answer of Defendant Jane Higgins Nash ("Jane Nash") as Trustee of the Trust created by the ESTATE OF MABEL ELAINE HIGGINS, deceased, commonly known as the Jane Higgins Nash Trust and as EXECUTOR of the ESTATE OF DECATUR HIGGINS, DECEASED and the ESTATE OF MABEL ELAINE HIGGINS, DECEASED shall be deemed the answer of each of the four newly added cross-defendants; (2) that each newly added cross-defendant is deemed to be a counter-claimant to the counterclaims raised by Jane Nash as to the other parties; and, (3) that the answer of each such counter-defendant shall be deemed the answer to the counter-claims of each new added counter-claimant.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

__________________

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Coppola v. Smith

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, FRESNO DIVISION
Apr 16, 2012
Case No. 1:11-cv-01257-AWI-BAM (E.D. Cal. Apr. 16, 2012)
Case details for

Coppola v. Smith

Case Details

Full title:VIOLA COPPOLA, GARY COPPOLA, and THE TRUST OF ANTHONY M. COPPOLA…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, FRESNO DIVISION

Date published: Apr 16, 2012

Citations

Case No. 1:11-cv-01257-AWI-BAM (E.D. Cal. Apr. 16, 2012)