From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Coppola v. Smith

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA - FRESNO DIVISION
Aug 16, 2012
Case No.: 1:11-CV-01257-AWI-BAM (E.D. Cal. Aug. 16, 2012)

Opinion

Case No.: 1:11-CV-01257-AWI-BAM

08-16-2012

VIOLA COPPOLA, GARY COPPOLA, and THE TRUST OF ANTHONY M. COPPOLA; Plaintiffs, v. GREGORY SMITH, an individual; RICHARD LASTER, an individual; and THE JANE HIGGINS NASH TRUST; JANE NASH AS EXECUTOR OF THE ESTATE OF DECATUR HIGGINS, HARLEY MILLER, an individual; CHERYL MILLER, an individual; MARTIN AND MARTIN PROPERTIES, BENART MAIN STREET PROPERTIES, CAL WATER SERVICE COMPANY, the CITY OF VISALIA and DOES 7-20, inclusive; Defendants. RELATED CROSS AND COUNTER-CLAIMS

GREBEN & ASSOCIATES Jan A. Greben Jeff Coyner Attorneys for Plaintiffs VIOLA COPPOLA, GARY COPPOLA, and the TRUST OF ANTHONY M. COPPOLA GUALCO LAW Lori J. Gualco Attorneys for Defendants RICHARD LASTER and GREGORY SMITH WILLIAMS, JORDAN, BRODERSEN & PRITCHETT LLP Steven R. Williams Attorneys for Defendant JANE NASH, as TRUSTEE OF THE JANE HIGGINS NASH TRUST GLASER, WEIL, FINK, JACOBS, HOWARD, AVCHEN & SHAPIRO LLP Gregory R. McClintock Noah P. Perch-Ahern Attorneys for Defendant CALIFORNIA WATER SERVICE COMPANY DOOLEY, HERR, PELTZER & RICHARDSON Leonard C. Herr Attorneys for Defendant CITY OF VISALIA CHIELPEGIAN LAW OFFICES Mark E. Chielpegian Attorneys for Defendant BENART MAIN STREET PROPERTIES


GREBEN & ASSOCIATES

Jan A. Greben, SBN 103464

Jeff Coyner, SBN 233499

Attorneys for Plaintiffs VIOLA COPPOLA, GARY COPPOLA,

and THE TRUST OF ANTHONY M. COPPOLA

STIPULATION AND ORDER

REGARDING FILING OF THIRD

AMENDED COMPLAINT

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between all parties, other than Martin and Martin Properties ("Martin"), that Plaintiffs shall be allowed to file a Third Amended Complaint. Martin has entered into a separate stipulation on file with the Court extending its response date to September 10, 2012, and has advised it does not oppose this Stipulation. The Third Amended Complaint will contain the following revisions:

• Paragraph 36 would be revised to the following: "CWS 02-03 was abandoned in 2005. Before it was abandoned, CWS 02-03 contained concentrations of PCE above the Method Detection Limit."
• Paragraph 64 would be revised to allege Health and Safety Code § 25363(e) instead of the current 26363(e).
• Plaintiffs would dismiss the Negligence claim against the City of Visalia ("City"). This claim remains alleged against all other parties.

The Third Amended Complaint shall be filed by August 22, 2012. Defendants shall have up to and including September 12, 2012 to respond to the Third Amended Complaint.

The City has a pending Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs' claim for HSAA, calendared for hearing on September 24, 2012. This hearing will remain as calendared as the allegations in the proposed Third Amended Complaint remain unchanged as to that claim.

GREBEN & ASSOCIATES

_________________

Jan A. Greben

Jeff Coyner

Attorneys for Plaintiffs VIOLA COPPOLA,

GARY COPPOLA, and the TRUST OF

ANTHONY M. COPPOLA

GUALCO LAW

_________________

Lori J. Gualco

Attorneys for Defendants RICHARD

LASTER and GREGORY SMITH

WILLIAMS, JORDAN, BRODERSEN &

PRITCHETT LLP

_________________

Steven R. Williams

Attorneys for Defendant JANE NASH, as

TRUSTEE OF THE JANE HIGGINS NASH TRUST

GLASER, WEIL, FINK, JACOBS, HOWARD,

AVCHEN & SHAPIRO LLP

_________________

Gregory R. McClintock

Noah P. Perch-Ahern

Attorneys for Defendant CALIFORNIA

WATER SERVICE COMPANY

DOOLEY, HERR, PELTZER & RICHARDSON

_________________

Leonard C. Herr

Attorneys for Defendant CITY OF VISALIA

CHIELPEGIAN LAW OFFICES

_________________

Mark E. Chielpegian

Attorneys for Defendant BENART MAIN

STREET PROPERTIES

ORDER

Based on the Stipulation of the Parties, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiffs' shall have up to and including August 22, 2012 to file a Third Amended Complaint. Defendants shall have up to and including September 12, 2012 to respond to the Third Amended Complaint. IT IS SO ORDERED.

Barbara A. McAuliffe

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Coppola v. Smith

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA - FRESNO DIVISION
Aug 16, 2012
Case No.: 1:11-CV-01257-AWI-BAM (E.D. Cal. Aug. 16, 2012)
Case details for

Coppola v. Smith

Case Details

Full title:VIOLA COPPOLA, GARY COPPOLA, and THE TRUST OF ANTHONY M. COPPOLA…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA - FRESNO DIVISION

Date published: Aug 16, 2012

Citations

Case No.: 1:11-CV-01257-AWI-BAM (E.D. Cal. Aug. 16, 2012)