From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Coppedge v. Coppedge

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Sep 19, 1951
234 N.C. 747 (N.C. 1951)

Opinion


66 S.E.2d 640 (N.C. 1951) 234 N.C. 747 HALL, v. SHIPPERS EXPRESS, Inc. et al. No. 596 Supreme Court of North Carolina. September 19, 1951

       Isaac C. Wright, Wilmington, for plaintiff-appellant.

       John H. Small and J. Laurence Jones, Charlotte, for defendants-appellees.

       DENNY, Justice.

       The case was brought back with the thought that the allegations of fraud were perhaps broad enough to invoke the principle announced in McCoy v. Justice, 199 N.C. 602, 155 S.E. 452; and approved in Horne v. Edwards, 215 N.C. 622, 3 S.E.2d 1, and Yancey v. Yancey, 230 N.C. 719, 55 S.E.2d 468; also discussed in Pomeroy's Equitys&sJurisprudence, 5th Ed., Section 919b, page 608, et seq., and counsel were notified to submit briefs on this question. The briefs filed on rehearing afford little or no assistance with respect to the question suggested or raised. A careful consideration of plaintiff's allegations, however, leaves us with the impression that they are insufficient to disturb the opinion heretofore written.

       The petition to rehear will, therefore, be dismissed without prejudice to the further rights of the parties to proceed as they may be advised.

       Petition dismissed.

       VALENTINE, J., took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.


Summaries of

Coppedge v. Coppedge

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Sep 19, 1951
234 N.C. 747 (N.C. 1951)
Case details for

Coppedge v. Coppedge

Case Details

Full title:COPPEDGE, v. COPPEDGE et al.

Court:Supreme Court of North Carolina

Date published: Sep 19, 1951

Citations

234 N.C. 747 (N.C. 1951)
234 N.C. 747
67 S.E.2d 463

Citing Cases

Yount v. Yount

That adjudication is conclusive and binding on this Court and the parties to this action until vacated on…

Lowder v. Rogers

In Hall v. Shippers Express, 234 N.C. 38 65 S.E.2d 333, pet. to reh. dismissed, 234 N.C. 747, 66 S.E.2d 640…