From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Copes v. Clem

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Sep 4, 2013
539 F. App'x 168 (4th Cir. 2013)

Opinion

No. 13-6599

09-04-2013

RANDOLPH COPES, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. DR. CLEM, Employee of CMS; P.A. JESSICA CECIL, Employee of CMS, Defendants - Appellees.

Randolph Copes, Appellant Pro Se. Patricia H. Beall, Michelle Jacquelyn Marzullo, MARKS, O'NEILL, O'BRIEN, DOHERTY & KELLY, P.C., Towson, Maryland, for Appellee.


UNPUBLISHED

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, Senior District Judge. (1:12-cv-00441-JFM) Before DUNCAN, AGEE, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Randolph Copes, Appellant Pro Se. Patricia H. Beall, Michelle Jacquelyn Marzullo, MARKS, O'NEILL, O'BRIEN, DOHERTY & KELLY, P.C., Towson, Maryland, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Randolph Copes appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Copes v. Clem, No. 1:12-cv-00441-JFM (D. Md. Mar. 13, 2013). We deny Copes' motion for appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED


Summaries of

Copes v. Clem

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Sep 4, 2013
539 F. App'x 168 (4th Cir. 2013)
Case details for

Copes v. Clem

Case Details

Full title:RANDOLPH COPES, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. DR. CLEM, Employee of CMS; P.A…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Sep 4, 2013

Citations

539 F. App'x 168 (4th Cir. 2013)