Copenhaver v. Marshall

Full title: HARRY ARTHUR COPENHAVER, Petitioner, v. JOHN MARSHALL (Warden), Respondent.

Court: United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California

Date published: Jun 16, 2011

EDCV 09-1616-CAS(CW) (C.D. Cal. Jun. 16, 2011)

Opinion

HARRY ARTHUR COPENHAVER, Petitioner, v. JOHN MARSHALL (Warden), Respondent. No. EDCV 09-1616-CAS(CW) United States District Court, C.D. California. June 16, 2011

          ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

          CHRISTINA A. SNYDER, District Judge.

         Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition, records on file, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. The court has engaged in a de novo review of those portions of the Report and Recommendation to which objection has been made. The court accepts the findings and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that judgment be entered denying the Petition and dismissing this action with prejudice.