From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Copemann v. Briel

United States District Court, N.D. Florida, Gainesville Division
Jun 8, 2011
CASE NO. 1:11cv75-SPM/GRJ (N.D. Fla. Jun. 8, 2011)

Opinion

CASE NO. 1:11cv75-SPM/GRJ.

June 8, 2011


ORDER


THIS CAUSE comes before the court on the magistrate judge's report and recommendation dated May 6, 2011 (doc. 4). Plaintiff has been afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). No objections have been filed. Having considered the report and recommendation, I have determined that the report and recommendation should be adopted.

Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED as follows:

1. The magistrate judge's report and recommendation (doc. 4) is ADOPTED and incorporated by reference in this order.

2. The Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (doc. 2) is denied.

3. This case is dismissed for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted.

DONE AND ORDERED.


Summaries of

Copemann v. Briel

United States District Court, N.D. Florida, Gainesville Division
Jun 8, 2011
CASE NO. 1:11cv75-SPM/GRJ (N.D. Fla. Jun. 8, 2011)
Case details for

Copemann v. Briel

Case Details

Full title:DALE ALONZO COPEMANN, Plaintiff, v. NANCY BRIEL, LESLIE GARRISON SHERYLLE…

Court:United States District Court, N.D. Florida, Gainesville Division

Date published: Jun 8, 2011

Citations

CASE NO. 1:11cv75-SPM/GRJ (N.D. Fla. Jun. 8, 2011)

Citing Cases

Ellis-Barr v. CP/DB Hous. Partners

he participated in the violation or ratified it, as Williams allegedly did. See e.g., U.S. v. Big D Enters.,…