From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Copeman v. Crews

United States District Court, N.D. Florida, Gainesville Division
Mar 28, 2011
CASE NO. 1:11cv47-SPM/GRJ (N.D. Fla. Mar. 28, 2011)

Opinion

CASE NO. 1:11cv47-SPM/GRJ.

March 28, 2011


ORDER


THIS CAUSE comes before the Court upon the Magistrate Judge's report and recommendation (doc. 5) dated March 17, 2011. Plaintiff was furnished a copy, and has filed objections (doc. 6).

Pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1), I find that the report and recommendation should be adopted. Plaintiff's complaint does not state a valid claim for relief. Accordingly it is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED:

1. The report and recommendation (doc. 5) is adopted and incorporated by reference in this order.

2. The motion to proceed in forma pauperis (doc. 3) is denied.

3. This case is dismissed as frivolous and for failure to state a claim for relief.

DONE AND ORDERED.


Summaries of

Copeman v. Crews

United States District Court, N.D. Florida, Gainesville Division
Mar 28, 2011
CASE NO. 1:11cv47-SPM/GRJ (N.D. Fla. Mar. 28, 2011)
Case details for

Copeman v. Crews

Case Details

Full title:DALE ALONZO COPEMAN, Plaintiff, v. WARREN CREWS, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, N.D. Florida, Gainesville Division

Date published: Mar 28, 2011

Citations

CASE NO. 1:11cv47-SPM/GRJ (N.D. Fla. Mar. 28, 2011)