From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Copeland v. State

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA
Apr 4, 2017
214 So. 3d 788 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2017)

Opinion

CASE NO. 1D17–0639

04-04-2017

Clarence COPELAND, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

Clarence Copeland, pro se, Petitioner. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.


Clarence Copeland, pro se, Petitioner.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of mandamus is denied as premature.

ROBERTS, C.J., LEWIS and WINSOR, JJ., CONCUR.


Summaries of

Copeland v. State

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA
Apr 4, 2017
214 So. 3d 788 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2017)
Case details for

Copeland v. State

Case Details

Full title:CLARENCE COPELAND, Petitioner, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent.

Court:DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

Date published: Apr 4, 2017

Citations

214 So. 3d 788 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2017)