From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Copeland v. Smith

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA PANAMA CITY DIVISION
Sep 14, 2017
CASE NO. 5:17-cv-133-MCR-GRJ (N.D. Fla. Sep. 14, 2017)

Opinion

CASE NO. 5:17-cv-133-MCR-GRJ

09-14-2017

BRYAN COPELAND, Plaintiff, v. WARDEN SMITH, et al., Defendants.


REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Plaintiff, an inmate in the Florida Department of Corrections, initiated this case by filing a civil rights complaint, alleging that his Eighth Amendment rights were being violated at Calhoun CI, where he was confined, because he was not receiving treatment for an injured knee. After screening the complaint, the Court found the complaint and motion to proceed in forma pauperis were deficient. Plaintiff was directed to file an amended complaint and to file a prisoner consent and financial certificate with a complete certified copy of his six-month account statement. The deadline to file these documents was June 8, 2017. Plaintiff failed to file the amended complaint or financial documents and instead requested an extension of time. The Court granted Plaintiff's request and directed him to file the amended complaint and prisoner consent and financial certificate with a complete certified copy of his six-month account statement by August 8, 2017. Additionally, although Plaintiff represented that he was transferred to another institution he has failed to file a change of address.

As of the date of this report and recommendation, Plaintiff has failed to file an amended complaint, failed to file the prisoner consent and financial certificate with a complete certified copy of his six-month account statement and failed to file a change of address.

Accordingly, it is respectfully RECOMMENDED that this case be DISMISSED without prejudice for failure to comply with an order of the Court and failure to prosecute.

IN CHAMBERS this 14th day of August 2017.

/s/_________

GARY R. JONES

United States Magistrate Judge

NOTICE TO THE PARTIES

Objections to these proposed findings and recommendations must be filed within fourteen (14) days after being served a copy thereof. Any different deadline that may appear on the electronic docket is for the Court's internal use only , and does not control. A copy of objections shall be served upon all other parties. If a party fails to object to the magistrate judge's findings or recommendations as to any particular claim or issue contained in a report and recommendation, that party waives the right to challenge on appeal the district court's order based on the unobjected-to factual and legal conclusions. See 11th Cir. Rule 3-1; 28 U.S.C. § 636.


Summaries of

Copeland v. Smith

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA PANAMA CITY DIVISION
Sep 14, 2017
CASE NO. 5:17-cv-133-MCR-GRJ (N.D. Fla. Sep. 14, 2017)
Case details for

Copeland v. Smith

Case Details

Full title:BRYAN COPELAND, Plaintiff, v. WARDEN SMITH, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA PANAMA CITY DIVISION

Date published: Sep 14, 2017

Citations

CASE NO. 5:17-cv-133-MCR-GRJ (N.D. Fla. Sep. 14, 2017)