From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Copeland v. People

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Nov 14, 2012
100 A.D.3d 750 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012)

Opinion

2012-11-14

In the Matter of Arturo COPELAND, petitioner, v. PEOPLE of State of New York, respondent.

Arturo Copeland, Oakdale, Louisiana, petitioner pro se. Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, New York, N.Y. (Charles F. Sanders of counsel), for respondent.


Arturo Copeland, Oakdale, Louisiana, petitioner pro se. Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, New York, N.Y. (Charles F. Sanders of counsel), for respondent.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, inter alia, in the nature of mandamus to compel the determination of the petitioner's motion pursuant to CPL 440.10 in a criminal action entitled People v. Copeland, pending in the Criminal Court, Kings County, under Indictment No. 39420/09, and application by the petitioner to prosecute the proceeding as a poor person.

ORDERED that the application for poor person relief is granted to the extent that the filing fee imposed by CPLR 8022(b) is waived, and the application is otherwise denied; and it is further,

ADJUDGED that the petition is dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

This Court does not have subject matter jurisdiction to entertain this proceeding ( seeCPLR 506[b]; 7804[b] ).

MASTRO, J.P., SKELOS, FLORIO and DICKERSON, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Copeland v. People

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Nov 14, 2012
100 A.D.3d 750 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012)
Case details for

Copeland v. People

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of Arturo COPELAND, petitioner, v. PEOPLE of State of New…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.

Date published: Nov 14, 2012

Citations

100 A.D.3d 750 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012)
2012 N.Y. Slip Op. 7663
953 N.Y.S.2d 873