From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Copeland v. Morgan Stanley Capital Tr.

United States District Court, Central District of California
Nov 22, 2024
CV 23-3536-AB (JPR) (C.D. Cal. Nov. 22, 2024)

Opinion

CV 23-3536-AB (JPR)

11-22-2024

GLADYS COPELAND, Plaintiff, v. MORGAN STANLEY CAPITAL TRUST et al., Defendants.


ORDER ACCEPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

ANDRE BIROTTE, JR. U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the First Amended Complaint; Plaintiff's requests for reconsideration and notice of lis pendens; Defendant Wells Fargo's motion to dismiss; the other records on file herein; the Magistrate Judge's September 12, 2024 Report and Recommendation; and Plaintiff's objections to the R. & R. The Court accepts the findings and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge.

ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED THAT:

1. The clerk terminate Defendants Wells Fargo and McCalla Raymer Leibert Pierce, LLP.

2. Plaintiff's requests for reconsideration and notice of lis pendens are denied as moot.

3. Defendant Wells Fargo's motion to dismiss is denied as moot.

4. The remaining claims against Doe Defendants are dismissed for failure to prosecute.

5. Judgment be entered consistent with this order.

6. The clerk serve this Order on all counsel or parties of record.


Summaries of

Copeland v. Morgan Stanley Capital Tr.

United States District Court, Central District of California
Nov 22, 2024
CV 23-3536-AB (JPR) (C.D. Cal. Nov. 22, 2024)
Case details for

Copeland v. Morgan Stanley Capital Tr.

Case Details

Full title:GLADYS COPELAND, Plaintiff, v. MORGAN STANLEY CAPITAL TRUST et al.…

Court:United States District Court, Central District of California

Date published: Nov 22, 2024

Citations

CV 23-3536-AB (JPR) (C.D. Cal. Nov. 22, 2024)