Copeland v. Espinoza

Full title: LINDA S. COPELAND, Petitioner, v. J. ESPINOZA, Warden, Respondent.

Court: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Mar 24, 2021

Case No. LACV 17-7156-SVW (LAL) (C.D. Cal. Mar. 24, 2021)

Opinion

Case No. LACV 17-7156-SVW (LAL)

03-24-2021

LINDA S. COPELAND, Petitioner, v. J. ESPINOZA, Warden, Respondent.

HONORABLE STEPHEN V. WILSON UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the First Amended Petition, the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, Petitioner's Objections and the remaining record, and has made a de novo determination.

Petitioner's Objections lack merit for the reasons stated in the Report and Recommendation.

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED THAT:

1. The Report and Recommendation is approved and accepted;

2. Judgment be entered denying the First Amended Petition and dismissing this action with prejudice; and

/// /// ///

3. The Clerk serve copies of this Order on the parties.

DATED: March 24, 2021

/s/_________

HONORABLE STEPHEN V. WILSON

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE