From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Copeland v. Adams

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Feb 24, 2023
No. 22-7125 (4th Cir. Feb. 24, 2023)

Opinion

22-7125

02-24-2023

JAQUN ORLANDO COPELAND, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. JONATHAN GRAY ADAMS, New Hanover County Sheriff's Department, Defendant-Appellee, and ED MCMAN, New Hanover County Sheriff, Defendant.

Jaqun Orlando Copeland, Appellant Pro Se.


UNPUBLISHED

Submitted: February 21, 2023

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Richard E. Myers, II, Chief District Judge. (5:20-ct-03297-M)

Jaqun Orlando Copeland, Appellant Pro Se.

Before NIEMEYER and DIAZ, Circuit Judges, and MOTZ, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM.

Jaqun Orlando Copeland appeals the district court's order denying Copeland's motion to appoint counsel and dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Copeland v. Adams, No. 5:20-ct-03297-M (E.D. N.C. Sept. 21, 2022). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

Copeland v. Adams

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Feb 24, 2023
No. 22-7125 (4th Cir. Feb. 24, 2023)
Case details for

Copeland v. Adams

Case Details

Full title:JAQUN ORLANDO COPELAND, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. JONATHAN GRAY ADAMS, New…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

Date published: Feb 24, 2023

Citations

No. 22-7125 (4th Cir. Feb. 24, 2023)