From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cooper v. The City of Elk Grove

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jun 1, 2022
2:22-cv-00443-TLN-AC (E.D. Cal. Jun. 1, 2022)

Opinion

2:22-cv-00443-TLN-AC

06-01-2022

KYLE S. COOPER, Petitioner, v. THE CITY OF ELK GROVE, Respondent.


ORDER

Troy L. Nunley, United States District Judge

Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.

On March 15, 2022, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on Petitioner and which contained notice to Petitioner that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty-one days. (ECF No. 4.) Petitioner has not filed objections to the findings and recommendations.

The Court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the magistrate judge's analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed March 15, 2022, (ECF No. 4), are adopted in full;
2. This action is DISMISSED without prejudice as second or successive; and
3. The Court declines to issue the Certificate of Appealability referenced in 28 U.S.C. § 2253.


Summaries of

Cooper v. The City of Elk Grove

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jun 1, 2022
2:22-cv-00443-TLN-AC (E.D. Cal. Jun. 1, 2022)
Case details for

Cooper v. The City of Elk Grove

Case Details

Full title:KYLE S. COOPER, Petitioner, v. THE CITY OF ELK GROVE, Respondent.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Jun 1, 2022

Citations

2:22-cv-00443-TLN-AC (E.D. Cal. Jun. 1, 2022)