From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cooper v. State

United States District Court, E.D. California
Jun 15, 2007
No. CIV S-07-1075 WBS KJM P (E.D. Cal. Jun. 15, 2007)

Opinion

No. CIV S-07-1075 WBS KJM P.

June 15, 2007


ORDER


Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254, together with a request to proceed in forma pauperis.

The application attacks a conviction issued by the Superior Court of San Bernardino County. While both this Court and the United States District Court in the district where petitioner was convicted have jurisdiction, see Braden v. 30th Judicial Circuit Court, 410 U.S. 484 (1973), any and all witnesses and evidence necessary for the resolution of petitioner's application are more readily available in San Bernardino County. Id. at 499 n. 15; 28 U.S.C. § 2241(d).

Accordingly, in the furtherance of justice, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. This court has not ruled on petitioner's application to proceed in forma pauperis; and

2. This matter is transferred to the United States District Court for the Central District of California.


Summaries of

Cooper v. State

United States District Court, E.D. California
Jun 15, 2007
No. CIV S-07-1075 WBS KJM P (E.D. Cal. Jun. 15, 2007)
Case details for

Cooper v. State

Case Details

Full title:MICHELLE COOPER, Petitioner, v. STATE OF CALIFORNIA, et al., Respondents

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Jun 15, 2007

Citations

No. CIV S-07-1075 WBS KJM P (E.D. Cal. Jun. 15, 2007)