From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cooper v. New Mexico Pub. Regulatory Comm'n

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Jun 25, 2012
Civil Case No: 12-12689 (E.D. Mich. Jun. 25, 2012)

Opinion

Civil Case No: 12-12689

06-25-2012

LYDIA M. COOPER, Plaintiff, v. NEW MEXICO PUBLIC REGULATORY COMMISSION, Defendant.


Honorable David M. Lawson

Magistrate Judge Mark A. Randon


ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL

The matter is before the Court on the plaintiff's motion for appointment of counsel. "'[A]ppointment of counsel in a civil case is . . . a matter within the discretion of the court. It is a privilege not a right.'" Childs v. Pellegrin, 822 F.2d 1382, 1384 (6th Cir. 1987) (quoting U.S. v. Madden, 352 F.2d 792, 793 (9th Cir. 1965)). The plaintiff has failed to present convincing reasons as to why this Court should exercise its discretionary power at this time.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the plaintiff's application for appointment of counsel [dkt #3] is DENIED.

______________

DAVID M. LAWSON

United States District Judge

PROOF OF SERVICE

The undersigned certifies that a copy of the foregoing order was served upon each attorney or party of record herein by electronic means or first class U.S. mail on June 25, 2012

______________

DEBORAH R. TOFIL


Summaries of

Cooper v. New Mexico Pub. Regulatory Comm'n

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Jun 25, 2012
Civil Case No: 12-12689 (E.D. Mich. Jun. 25, 2012)
Case details for

Cooper v. New Mexico Pub. Regulatory Comm'n

Case Details

Full title:LYDIA M. COOPER, Plaintiff, v. NEW MEXICO PUBLIC REGULATORY COMMISSION…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

Date published: Jun 25, 2012

Citations

Civil Case No: 12-12689 (E.D. Mich. Jun. 25, 2012)