From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cooper, v. Loftis

Supreme Court of Delaware, Kent County
Mar 1, 1797
1 Del. Cas. 429 (Del. 1797)

Opinion

March, 1797.

Ridgely for plaintiff. Miller and Bayard for defendant.


In this case it was ruled by the Court that if an executor pay or deliver a sum of money or chattel to a person immediately entitled to the possession, he or his securities were not liable afterwards to any person claiming a future or contingent interest in the same property.


Summaries of

Cooper, v. Loftis

Supreme Court of Delaware, Kent County
Mar 1, 1797
1 Del. Cas. 429 (Del. 1797)
Case details for

Cooper, v. Loftis

Case Details

Full title:COOPER, Assignee, v. LOFTIS

Court:Supreme Court of Delaware, Kent County

Date published: Mar 1, 1797

Citations

1 Del. Cas. 429 (Del. 1797)