From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cooper v. L.A. Cnty. Sheriff's Dep't

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Sep 17, 2018
NO. CV 17-8335-FMO (AGR) (C.D. Cal. Sep. 17, 2018)

Opinion

NO. CV 17-8335-FMO (AGR)

09-17-2018

CHARLES KELLER COOPER, JR., Plaintiff, v. LOS ANGELES COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, et al., Defendants.


ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the complaint, records on file, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. No objections to the Report have been filed. The Court accepts the findings and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge.

IT IS ORDERED that Defendants' motions to dismiss the complaint (Dkt. Nos. 12, 31) are GRANTED IN PART as follows:

(1) Defendants' motion to dismiss (Dkt. No. 12) based on failure to exhaust remedies is denied without prejudice;

(2) Defendants' motions to dismiss the Monell claims in Claims One and Two is granted with leave to amend;

(3) Defendant Marbach's motion to dismiss the complaint (Dkt. No. 31) is granted with leave to amend; and

(4) Plaintiff is granted leave to file a First Amended Complaint within 30 days after the district court's order. In addition to curing the deficiencies identified in this Report and Recommendation, Plaintiff may correct dates and the name of any defendant. DATED: September 17, 2018

/s/_________

FERNANDO M. OLGUIN

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Cooper v. L.A. Cnty. Sheriff's Dep't

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Sep 17, 2018
NO. CV 17-8335-FMO (AGR) (C.D. Cal. Sep. 17, 2018)
Case details for

Cooper v. L.A. Cnty. Sheriff's Dep't

Case Details

Full title:CHARLES KELLER COOPER, JR., Plaintiff, v. LOS ANGELES COUNTY SHERIFF'S…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Sep 17, 2018

Citations

NO. CV 17-8335-FMO (AGR) (C.D. Cal. Sep. 17, 2018)