From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cooper v. Kaur

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 18, 2012
No. CIV S-10-1057 GEB DAD P (E.D. Cal. Jan. 18, 2012)

Opinion

No. CIV S-10-1057 GEB DAD P

01-18-2012

TROY COOPER, Plaintiff, v. KAUR, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

On June 15, 2011, the Magistrate Judge issued an order denying appointment of counsel. On January 11, 2012, plaintiff filed a motion for reconsideration of that order. Local Rule 303(b), states "rulings by Magistrate Judges shall be final if no reconsideration thereof is sought from the Court within fourteen days . . . from the date of service of the ruling on the parties. . ." E.D. Local Rule 303(b). Plaintiff's request for reconsideration of the magistrate judge's order of June 15, 2011, is therefore untimely.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's motion for reconsideration (Doc. No. 57) is denied.

_________________________

GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR.

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Cooper v. Kaur

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 18, 2012
No. CIV S-10-1057 GEB DAD P (E.D. Cal. Jan. 18, 2012)
Case details for

Cooper v. Kaur

Case Details

Full title:TROY COOPER, Plaintiff, v. KAUR, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Jan 18, 2012

Citations

No. CIV S-10-1057 GEB DAD P (E.D. Cal. Jan. 18, 2012)