From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cooper v. Hanawe

United States District Court, Central District of California
Apr 22, 2024
5:24-cv-00339-SSS-SHKx (C.D. Cal. Apr. 22, 2024)

Opinion

5:24-cv-00339-SSS-SHKx

04-22-2024

Dennis Cooper v. David Fadhil Hanawe, et al.


Present: Honorable SUNSHINE S. SYKES, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE.

CIVIL MINUTES-GENERAL

Proceedings: (IN CHAMBERS) Order to Show Cause re Dismissal for Lack of Prosecution

Generally, each Defendant must answer or otherwise respond to the complaint within 21 days after service (60 days if the Defendant is the United States). Fed. R. Civ. Proc. 12(a)(1).

In the present case, it appears that Plaintiff served the summons and complaint on one or more Defendants more than 21 days ago (60 days if the Defendant is the United States), but such Defendant(s) did not file an answer or otherwise respond to the complaint. Accordingly, the Court, on its own motion, hereby orders Plaintiff to show cause in writing on or before May 6, 2024, why this action should not be dismissed, with respect to Defendant David Fadhil Hanawe, dba Yucaipa Liquor and Mini Mart, who has not filed an answer or otherwise responded to the complaint. Pursuant to Rule 78 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the court finds that this matter is appropriate for submission without oral argument. This Order to Show Cause will be discharged if Plaintiff files, before the deadline set forth above, a request for the entry of default with respect to the applicable Defendant(s). Fed. R. Civ. Proc. 55(a).

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Cooper v. Hanawe

United States District Court, Central District of California
Apr 22, 2024
5:24-cv-00339-SSS-SHKx (C.D. Cal. Apr. 22, 2024)
Case details for

Cooper v. Hanawe

Case Details

Full title:Dennis Cooper v. David Fadhil Hanawe, et al.

Court:United States District Court, Central District of California

Date published: Apr 22, 2024

Citations

5:24-cv-00339-SSS-SHKx (C.D. Cal. Apr. 22, 2024)