From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cooper v. Florida Parole Commission

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Apr 5, 2006
924 So. 2d 966 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)

Opinion

No. 4D05-2609.

April 5, 2006.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, Okeechobee County; William L. Roby, Judge; L.T. Case No. 04-274 CA.

Marvin Cooper, Okeechobee, pro se.

Bradley R. Bischoff, Tallahassee, for appellee.


Marvin Cooper seeks review of the trial court's dismissal, as untimely, of his petition for writ of habeas corpus, in which he challenged the revocation of his conditional release supervision. Concluding that Cooper did not allege that he was entitled to immediate release should he prevail, the trial court treated his petition for writ of habeas corpus as a petition for writ of mandamus. The court then determined that the petition was untimely filed, pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.100(c). Rule 9.100(c)(2) requires petitions challenging quasi-judicial actions to be filed within thirty days of rendition of the order to be reviewed.

We initially redesignated Cooper's appeal as a petition for writ of certiorari. However, based on our review of case law regarding the appropriate vehicle for seeking relief when the circuit court did not decide the prisoner's petition for review of administrative action on the merits, we have reverted to treating this matter as an appeal. See Gibson v. Fla. Parole Comm'n, 895 So.2d 1291 (Fla. 5th DCA 2005); Roth v. Crosby, 884 So.2d 407, 408 n. 2 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004); Green v. Moore, 777 So.2d 425, 426 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000).

Although the trial court incorrectly converted appellant's habeas petition into a mandamus petition, see Knowles v. Fla. Parole Comm'n, 846 So.2d 1246 (Fla. 1st DCA 2003); Heard v. Fla. Parole Comm'n, 811 So.2d 808 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002), the court properly denied the petition as untimely. § 95.11(5)(f), Fla. Stat. Accordingly, we affirm the dismissal of the petition. However, we reverse the trial court's order imposing a lien on appellant's inmate trust account for filing fees. See Schmidt v. Crusoe, 878 So.2d 361 (Fla. 2003); Heard, 811 So.2d at 808-09; Thomas v. State, 904 So.2d 502 (Fla. 4th DCA 2005); see also Cox v. Crosby, 31 Fla. L. Weekly D310, ___ So.2d ___, 2006 WL 176681 (Fla. 1st DCA Jan. 26, 2006).

FARMER, TAYLOR and HAZOURI, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Cooper v. Florida Parole Commission

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Apr 5, 2006
924 So. 2d 966 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)
Case details for

Cooper v. Florida Parole Commission

Case Details

Full title:Marvin COOPER, Appellant, v. FLORIDA PAROLE COMMISSION, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District

Date published: Apr 5, 2006

Citations

924 So. 2d 966 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)

Citing Cases

Jones v. Florida Parole Com'n

Judicial history with regard to the application of this statute has been checkered. Previously, in Cooper v.…

Jones v. Florida Parole

Willie F. Jones (Jones) filed a petition for writ of certiorari in this court, challenging an order…