From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cooper v. Dart Area Rapid Transit

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION
Jan 14, 2016
No. 3:14-CV-3832-B (N.D. Tex. Jan. 14, 2016)

Opinion

No. 3:14-CV-3832-B

01-14-2016

RUTH COOPER, Plaintiff, v. DART AREA RAPID TRANSIT, Defendant.


ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

After reviewing all relevant matters of record in this case, including the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge and any objections thereto, in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), the undersigned District Judge is of the opinion that the Findings and Conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct and they are accepted as the Findings and Conclusions of the Court.

Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's 3rd Amended Complaint for Failure to State a Claim, filed April 27, 2015 (doc. 30) is GRANTED. By separate judgment, the federal claims against defendant Dallas Area Rapid Transit will be DISMISSED with prejudice for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted, and the state law claims will be DISMISSED without prejudice to her pursuing them in state court.

SIGNED this 14th day of January , 2016.

/s/ _________

JANE J. BOYLE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Cooper v. Dart Area Rapid Transit

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION
Jan 14, 2016
No. 3:14-CV-3832-B (N.D. Tex. Jan. 14, 2016)
Case details for

Cooper v. Dart Area Rapid Transit

Case Details

Full title:RUTH COOPER, Plaintiff, v. DART AREA RAPID TRANSIT, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION

Date published: Jan 14, 2016

Citations

No. 3:14-CV-3832-B (N.D. Tex. Jan. 14, 2016)

Citing Cases

Phazr, Inc. v. Ramakrishna

See id. § 1367(c)(3) ("The district courts may decline to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over a claim" it…

Phazr, Inc. v. Ramakrishna

See id. § 1367(c)(3) ("The district courts may decline to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over a claim" it…