Opinion
May 24, 1999
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Roberto, J.).
Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.
The record fails to support the defendant's claim that certain provisions of the stipulation of settlement he entered into over five years earlier were the product of overreaching, duress, mistake, or unconscionable conduct ( see, Kazimierski v. Weiss, 252 A.D.2d 481; Palazolo v. Palazolo, 244 A.D.2d 393; see also, Cavalli v. Cavalli, 226 A.D.2d 666; Chauhan v. Thakur, 184 A.D.2d 744). Accordingly, the court properly denied his motion to modify the stipulation and judgment of divorce.
The defendant's remaining contentions are without merit.
S. Miller, J. P., Ritter, Thompson and Altman, JJ., concur.