From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cooper v. Astrue

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON
Nov 2, 2011
Civ. No. 10-820-CL (D. Or. Nov. 2, 2011)

Opinion

Civ. No. 10-820-CL.

November 2, 2011


ORDER


Magistrate Judge Mark D. Clarke filed a Report and Recommendation (#20), and the matter is now before this court.See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B), Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b). Although no objections have been filed, I review the legal principles de novo. See Lorin Corp. v Goto Co., Ltd., 700 F.2d 1202, 1206 (9th Cir. 1983).

I find no error in the report. Magistrate Judge Clarke's Report and Recommendation (#20) is adopted. The Commissioner's decision is affirmed.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Cooper v. Astrue

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON
Nov 2, 2011
Civ. No. 10-820-CL (D. Or. Nov. 2, 2011)
Case details for

Cooper v. Astrue

Case Details

Full title:STEVEN M. COOPER, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

Date published: Nov 2, 2011

Citations

Civ. No. 10-820-CL (D. Or. Nov. 2, 2011)

Citing Cases

Timm v. Comm'r Soc. Sec. Admin.

Id. This court has in the past affirmed the decision of the ALJ in which the ALJ has accounted for a…