Opinion
2317-23S
06-05-2023
ORDER
Kathleen Kerrigan Chief Judge.
On April 27, 2023, petitioners filed four Exhibit(s). However, further review indicates that these filings appear to be more akin to Supplements to Response to Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction.
Upon due consideration, it is
ORDERED that petitioners' Exhibit(s) (Docket Index No. 10), filed April 27, 2023, is recharacterized as petitioners' First Supplement to Response to Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction. It is further
ORDERED that petitioners' Exhibit(s) (Docket Index No. 11), filed April 27, 2023, is recharacterized as petitioners' Second Supplement to Response to Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction. It is further
ORDERED that petitioners' Exhibit(s) (Docket Index No. 12), filed April 27, 2023, is recharacterized as petitioners' Third Supplement to Response to Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction. It is further
ORDERED that petitioners' Exhibit(s) (Docket Index No. 13), filed April 27, 2023, is recharacterized as petitioners' Fourth Supplement to Response to Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction.