From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Coolidge v. Stoddard

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jun 25, 1907
120 App. Div. 641 (N.Y. App. Div. 1907)

Opinion

June 25, 1907.

Henry W. Williams, for the appellant.

Charles H. Stoddard, for the respondent.


This action is brought to recover upon four promissory notes, each set up in a separate count. The answer denies each count separately, and, among other things, alleges as to each note that prior to the commencement of the action the defendant paid, satisfied and discharged the same. The plaintiff, upon affidavit that he has no knowledge of any payment except those expressly admitted in the complaint, and that he has no information or means of information as to any other payments, and upon letters from the defendant practically admitting liability for a great part of the indebtedness claimed, asks a bill of particulars of the payments claimed. The case presents facts which render a bill of particulars clearly proper if particulars may be ordered as to alleged payments. That such order may be made is established in this department by Klock v. Brennan (35 N.Y. St. Repr. 745) and seems to be well within the provisions of section 531 of the Code of Civil Procedure. The order is, therefore, reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and a bill of particulars ordered stating with reasonable certainty the time, place and amount of the payments, or when and how the notes were otherwise satisfied or discharged.

All concurred.

Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and bill of particulars ordered stating with reasonable certainty the time and place and amount of payments, or when and how the notes were otherwise satisfied or discharged.


Summaries of

Coolidge v. Stoddard

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jun 25, 1907
120 App. Div. 641 (N.Y. App. Div. 1907)
Case details for

Coolidge v. Stoddard

Case Details

Full title:JONATHAN M. COOLIDGE, Appellant, v . SENECA R. STODDARD, Respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Jun 25, 1907

Citations

120 App. Div. 641 (N.Y. App. Div. 1907)
105 N.Y.S. 544

Citing Cases

Sittig v. Cohen

That under proper circumstances a bill of particulars of alleged payments may be required is established by…

Nonpareil Painting Co., Inc., v. Holling

" The court also held: "That under proper circumstances a bill of particulars of alleged payments may be…