From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cooley v. Servicemaster Co.

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jun 7, 2022
2:20-CV-01382-MCE-DB (E.D. Cal. Jun. 7, 2022)

Opinion

2:20-CV-01382-MCE-DB

06-07-2022

TYRON COOLEY, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, v. THE SERVICEMASTER COMPANY, LLC, TERMINIX INTERNATIONAL, INC., THE TERMINIX INTERNATIONAL COMPANY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP., and Does 1 through 50, inclusive, Defendants.

WORKMAN LAW FIRM, PC Robin G. Workman Attorneys for Tyron Cooley, and all others similarly situated LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C. Douglas A. Wickham Attorneys for Defendants THE SERVICEMASTER COMPANY, LLC, TERMINIX INTERNATIONAL, INC., THE TERMINIX INTERNATIONAL COMPANY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP


WORKMAN LAW FIRM, PC Robin G. Workman Attorneys for Tyron Cooley, and all others similarly situated

LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C. Douglas A. Wickham Attorneys for Defendants THE SERVICEMASTER COMPANY, LLC, TERMINIX INTERNATIONAL, INC., THE TERMINIX INTERNATIONAL COMPANY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP

ORDER RE STATUS REPORT RE ARBITRATION

MORRISON C. ENGLAND SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

On August 17, 2021, this Court issued an order denying Plaintiff's Motion to Remand (ECF No. 5); granting Defendants' Motion to Compel Arbitration and Stay the Case (ECF No. 7); staying the case pending resolution of Plaintiff's individual claims before the arbitrator and directing the parties to file Joint Status Reports every 60 days. (ECF No. 18.)

The parties filed a Joint Status Report on May 12, 2022, alerting the Court that the matter is proceeding before the American Arbitration Association (“AAA”) and that an arbitration hearing is scheduled for June 12-14, 2023.

Given the arbitration is scheduled to occur more than a year from now in June, 2023, the parties are hereby relieved from the requirement to file status reports every 60 days, as required by the Court's August 17, 2021, Order.

The Court directs the parties to submit a Joint Status Report within 60 days of conclusion of the Arbitration.

ORDER

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Cooley v. Servicemaster Co.

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jun 7, 2022
2:20-CV-01382-MCE-DB (E.D. Cal. Jun. 7, 2022)
Case details for

Cooley v. Servicemaster Co.

Case Details

Full title:TYRON COOLEY, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated…

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Jun 7, 2022

Citations

2:20-CV-01382-MCE-DB (E.D. Cal. Jun. 7, 2022)