From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cooley v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue

United States Tax Court
Sep 13, 2022
No. 14640-21S (U.S.T.C. Sep. 13, 2022)

Opinion

14640-21S

09-13-2022

DEANDRE M. COOLEY & LISA M. COOLEY, Petitioners v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent


ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

LEWIS R. CARLUZZO CHIEF SPECIAL TRIAL JUDGE

This case for the redetermination of a deficiency is before the Court on respondent's oral motion to dismiss for lack of prosecution, made September 12, 2022, when the case was called from the calendar for trial in Chicago, Illinois. Petitioners' counsel, Bradley S. McCann, did not appear; neither did either petitioner. In his motion respondent requests that the Court find that there is a $27,833 deficiency in petitioners' 2018 Federal income tax, and that petitioners are liable for a $3,560 I.R.C. section 6662(a) penalty for that year. Premises considered, and for cause set forth more fully in the transcript of the proceedings, it is

ORDERED that on or before October 12, 2022, petitioners, through counsel or otherwise, show cause in writing why respondent's oral motion should not be granted. It is further

ORDERED that in addition to regular service on the parties, the Court serve petitioners directly at 16342 Fairfield Drive, Plainfield, Illinois 60586.


Summaries of

Cooley v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue

United States Tax Court
Sep 13, 2022
No. 14640-21S (U.S.T.C. Sep. 13, 2022)
Case details for

Cooley v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue

Case Details

Full title:DEANDRE M. COOLEY & LISA M. COOLEY, Petitioners v. COMMISSIONER OF…

Court:United States Tax Court

Date published: Sep 13, 2022

Citations

No. 14640-21S (U.S.T.C. Sep. 13, 2022)