From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cooley v. Brooks

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Sep 21, 2010
Civil Action No. 10-185 Erie (W.D. Pa. Sep. 21, 2010)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 10-185 Erie.

September 21, 2010


MEMORANDUM ORDER


This habeas corpus action was received by the Clerk of Court on August 2, 2010 and was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Susan Paradise Baxter for report and recommendation in accordance with the Magistrates Act, 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), and Rules 72.1.3 and 72.1.4 of the Local Rules for Magistrates.

The Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation [Doc. No. 3], filed on August 30, 2010, recommended that Petitioner's petition be dismissed for failure to prosecute. Petitioner was allowed fourteen (14) days from the date of service to file objections and service was made on Petitioner by certified mail. No objections were filed. After de novo review of the documents in the case, together with the Report and Recommendation, the following order is entered:

AND NOW, this 21st day of September, 2010;

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Petitioner's petition is DISMISSED for failure to prosecute.

The Report and Recommendation [Doc. No. 14] of Magistrate Judge Baxter, filed on August 30, 2010, is adopted as the opinion of the Court.


Summaries of

Cooley v. Brooks

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Sep 21, 2010
Civil Action No. 10-185 Erie (W.D. Pa. Sep. 21, 2010)
Case details for

Cooley v. Brooks

Case Details

Full title:ROMEO COOLEY, Petitioner, v. MS. M. BROOKS, et al., Respondents

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Sep 21, 2010

Citations

Civil Action No. 10-185 Erie (W.D. Pa. Sep. 21, 2010)