From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cool v. Turner

Supreme Court of Ohio.
Jan 17, 2013
135 Ohio St. 3d 185 (Ohio 2013)

Opinion

No. 2012–1344.

2013-01-17

COOL, Appellant, v. TURNER, Warden, Appellee.

Appeal from the Court of Appeals for Marion County, No. 9–12–28. Michael E. Cool, pro se. Michael DeWine, Attorney General, and Maura O'Neill Jaite, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.


Appeal from the Court of Appeals for Marion County, No. 9–12–28.
Michael E. Cool, pro se. Michael DeWine, Attorney General, and Maura O'Neill Jaite, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.
PER CURIAM.

[Ohio St.3d 185]{¶ 1} We affirm the judgment dismissing the petition of appellant, Michael E. Cool, for a writ of habeas corpus. He had an adequate remedy by appeal to raise his claim that the trial court erred in denying his motion for jail-time credit. See State ex rel. Rudolph v. Horton, 119 Ohio St.3d 350, 2008-Ohio-4476, 894 N.E.2d 49, ¶ 3. And the fact that Cool has already unsuccessfully invoked alternate remedies in the ordinary course of law by motion and appeal to raise this claim does not entitle him to extraordinary relief in habeas corpus to relitigate the matter. Heddleston v. Mack, 84 Ohio St.3d 213, 702 N.E.2d 1198 (1998). Res judicata bars Cool from using habeas corpus to obtain a successive appellate review of the same claim. State ex rel. Harsh v. Sheets, 132 Ohio St.3d 198, 2012-Ohio-2368, 970 N.E.2d 926, ¶ 1.

Judgment affirmed.

O'CONNOR, C.J., and PFEIFER, O'DONNELL, LANZINGER, KENNEDY, FRENCH, and O'NEILL, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Cool v. Turner

Supreme Court of Ohio.
Jan 17, 2013
135 Ohio St. 3d 185 (Ohio 2013)
Case details for

Cool v. Turner

Case Details

Full title:COOL, Appellant, v. TURNER, Warden, Appellee.

Court:Supreme Court of Ohio.

Date published: Jan 17, 2013

Citations

135 Ohio St. 3d 185 (Ohio 2013)
135 Ohio St. 3d 185

Citing Cases

Draughon v. Jenkins

"Res judicata bars [Draughon] from using habeas corpus to obtain a successive appellate review of the same…

State ex rel. Shafer v. Wainwright

This claim is not cognizable in habeas corpus actions, as he had an adequate remedy by way of direct appeal…