Cook v. State

1 Citing case

  1. Harper v. State

    94 S.E.2d 105 (Ga. Ct. App. 1956)   Cited 2 times

    It is just as much a violation of the prohibition law to make and manufacture intoxicating beer as it is to distill whisky from alcoholic beer. See Summerville v. State, 77 Ga. App. 106 ( 47 S.E.2d 830); Ellard v. State, 86 Ga. App. 495 ( 71 S.E.2d 666) and Cook v. State, 88 Ga. App. 330 ( 76 S.E.2d 629). It is clear to our minds that the defendant was attempting to manufacture intoxicating beer and that he had proceeded to the extent of doing acts in furtherance of the violation of this statute when he was intercepted and prevented from completing the manufacture of the beer by the presence of the officers. The court did not err in denying the motion for a new trial as it pertains to the general grounds.