From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cook v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Apr 19, 2002
565 S.E.2d 487 (Ga. Ct. App. 2002)

Opinion

A02A0896.

DECIDED: APRIL 19, 2002.

Motion to correct illegal sentence. Douglas Superior Court. Before Judge James.

Deangelo Cook, pro se.

David McDade, District Attorney, William H. McClain, Assistant District Attorney, for appellee.


Deangelo Cook appeals the trial court's denial of his motion to correct his sentence. Cook contends that the sentence of life without parole for armed robbery was not permitted under the laws in effect when he committed the crimes. We disagree and affirm.

In April 1993, Cook and two accomplices robbed a bank while using a pistol. Cook was indicted for armed robbery and possession of a firearm by a convicted felon. The State also charged Cook with being a recidivist, and at trial the State presented evidence of his four prior felony convictions. In January 1994, a jury found Cook guilty of armed robbery, and the trial court sentenced him as a recidivist to life imprisonment without parole. We affirmed Cook's conviction on direct appeal.

Cook also was convicted of being a felon in possession of a firearm, but that count is not at issue in this appeal.

Cook v. State, 221 Ga. App. 831 ( 472 S.E.2d 686) (1996).

In November 2000, Cook filed a "Motion to Correct and Set Aside Illegal Sentence," arguing that the recidivist sentencing statute in effect when he committed the armed robbery — OCGA § 17-10-7 — did not allow a sentence of life without parole. According to Cook, life without parole was not authorized at that time. That, however, is incorrect.

In April 1993, OCGA § 17-10-7 (b) provided that

[a]ny person who, after having been convicted . . . for three felonies . . ., commits a felony within this state other than a capital felony, must, upon conviction for such fourth offense or for subsequent offenses, serve the maximum time provided in the sentence of the judge based upon such conviction and shall not be eligible for parole until the maximum sentence has been served.

(Emphasis supplied.)

Although the armed robbery statute provides for a potential sentence of death, Georgia's appellate courts have recognized that such a penalty would be unconstitutional. Thus, armed robbery is not considered a capital felony for the purpose of recidivist sentencing, and Cook's sentence was governed by OCGA § 17-10-7 (b). As his armed robbery conviction was his fifth felony conviction, the trial court was authorized to sentence him to the maximum sentence of life imprisonment, with no eligibility for parole. It follows that the court did not err in denying Cook's motion to correct his sentence.

See Collins v. State, 239 Ga. 400, 402-403 (2) ( 236 S.E.2d 759) (1977); Harper v. State, 203 Ga. App. 775, 776 ( 417 S.E.2d 435) (1992).

Getty v. State, 207 Ga. App. 736, 737 ( 429 S.E.2d 100) (1993).

See id.; Moore v. State, 251 Ga. App. 295 ( 554 S.E.2d 204) (2001).

Judgment affirmed. Andrews, P.J., and Mikell, J., concur.


DECIDED APRIL 19, 2002 — RECONSIDERATION DENIED MAY 16, 2002.


Summaries of

Cook v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Apr 19, 2002
565 S.E.2d 487 (Ga. Ct. App. 2002)
Case details for

Cook v. State

Case Details

Full title:COOK v. THE STATE

Court:Court of Appeals of Georgia

Date published: Apr 19, 2002

Citations

565 S.E.2d 487 (Ga. Ct. App. 2002)
565 S.E.2d 487

Citing Cases

McCorkle v. State

Based upon this subsection, the trial court correctly concluded that the life sentence was mandated to be…

Dixon v. State

Therefore, Dixon's sentence was governed by OCGA § 17-10-7 (c), and the trial court did not err by denying…