From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cook v. Saul

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA AT CHARLESTON
Jan 6, 2020
Civil Action No. 2:18-cv-01112 (S.D.W. Va. Jan. 6, 2020)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 2:18-cv-01112

01-06-2020

HERMAN LEE COOK, Plaintiff, v. ANDREW SAUL, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant.


MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

The court having received the Proposed Findings and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Dwane L. Tinsley, filed November 22, 2019; and the magistrate judge having recommended that the court dismiss this action pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m) for failure to timely serve process; and no objection having been filed to the Proposed Findings and Recommendation, it is ORDERED that the findings made in the Proposed Findings and Recommendation of the magistrate judge be, and they hereby are, adopted by the court and incorporated herein.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that this case be, and it hereby is, dismissed without prejudice.

The Clerk is directed to forward copies of this memorandum opinion and order to all counsel of record and to the United States Magistrate Judge.

Enter: January 6, 2020

/s/_________

John T. Copenhaver, Jr.

Senior United States District Judge


Summaries of

Cook v. Saul

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA AT CHARLESTON
Jan 6, 2020
Civil Action No. 2:18-cv-01112 (S.D.W. Va. Jan. 6, 2020)
Case details for

Cook v. Saul

Case Details

Full title:HERMAN LEE COOK, Plaintiff, v. ANDREW SAUL, Commissioner of Social…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA AT CHARLESTON

Date published: Jan 6, 2020

Citations

Civil Action No. 2:18-cv-01112 (S.D.W. Va. Jan. 6, 2020)