From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cook v. Sacramento Cnty.

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jun 24, 2022
2:21-CV-0893-WBS-DMC-P (E.D. Cal. Jun. 24, 2022)

Opinion

2:21-CV-0893-WBS-DMC-P

06-24-2022

MARILYN YVETTE COOK, Plaintiff, v. SACRAMENTO COUNTY, et al., Defendants.


FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

DENNIS M. COTA, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE.

Plaintiff, an inmate proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On April 12, 2022, the Court directed Plaintiff to file an amended complaint within 30 days. Plaintiff was warned that failure to file an amended complaint may result in dismissal of this action for lack of prosecution and failure to comply with court rules and orders. See Local Rule 110. To date, plaintiff has not complied.

Based on the foregoing, the undersigned recommends that this action be dismissed, without prejudice, for lack of prosecution and failure to comply with court rules and orders.

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Within 14 days after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written objections with the court. Responses to objections shall be filed within 14 days after service of objections. Failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal. See Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).


Summaries of

Cook v. Sacramento Cnty.

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jun 24, 2022
2:21-CV-0893-WBS-DMC-P (E.D. Cal. Jun. 24, 2022)
Case details for

Cook v. Sacramento Cnty.

Case Details

Full title:MARILYN YVETTE COOK, Plaintiff, v. SACRAMENTO COUNTY, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Jun 24, 2022

Citations

2:21-CV-0893-WBS-DMC-P (E.D. Cal. Jun. 24, 2022)