From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cook v. Rockwell Int'l Corp.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Oct 16, 2012
Civil Action No. 90-CV-181-JLK (D. Colo. Oct. 16, 2012)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 90-CV-181-JLK

10-16-2012

MERILYN COOK, et al., Plaintiffs, v. ROCKWELL INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION AND THE DOW CHEMICAL COMPANY, Defendants.


Judge John L. Kane


ORDER RE BRIEFING SCHEDULE ON REMAND

Kane, J.

Plaintiffs' reinstatement theory shall provide the content for the next chapter in this now two plus decades old saga. Specifically, Plaintiffs shall open remand proceedings by briefing the following two bedrock reinstatement issues: 1) Does the existing jury verdict in this case support entry of this Court's judgment on Plaintiffs' nuisance claim under Colorado law and diversity jurisdiction?; and 2) May a plaintiff who brings a Prince-Anderson Act claim simultaneously pursue a freestanding state-law claim based on the same facts?

Plaintiffs' opening brief shall be due on or before December 12, 2012. Defendants' answer brief shall be due 60 days from the filing of Plaintiffs' opening brief. Plaintiffs' reply brief shall be due 45 days from filing of Defendants' response brief.

The remaining issues (class re-certification, preemption, etc.) shall be treated if and as appropriate in light of my resolution concerning the reinstatement theory.

Dated this 16th day of October, 2012, at Denver, Colorado.

John L. Kane

US SENIOR DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Cook v. Rockwell Int'l Corp.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Oct 16, 2012
Civil Action No. 90-CV-181-JLK (D. Colo. Oct. 16, 2012)
Case details for

Cook v. Rockwell Int'l Corp.

Case Details

Full title:MERILYN COOK, et al., Plaintiffs, v. ROCKWELL INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Date published: Oct 16, 2012

Citations

Civil Action No. 90-CV-181-JLK (D. Colo. Oct. 16, 2012)