From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cook v. McHugh

United States District Court, M.D. Tennessee, Nashville Division
Feb 8, 2011
No. 3:10-0643 (M.D. Tenn. Feb. 8, 2011)

Opinion

No. 3:10-0643.

February 8, 2011


ORDER


Before the Court is the Defendant's motion to dismiss (Docket Entry No. 15). To date, Plaintiff has not responded to this motion nor sought an extension of time.

In a related action, the Honorable John T. Nixon granted the Defendant's motion for summary judgment in Charles E. Cook v. John McHugh, 3:09-0649 (Docket Entry No. 31, Memorandum Order, January 27, 2011).

Under Local Rules 7.01(b), the "[f]ailure to file a timely response shall indicate that there is no opposition to the motion." Given Plaintiff's failure to respond, the Defendant's motion to dismiss (Docket Entry 14) is GRANTED. This action is DISMISSED with prejudice.

It is so ORDERED. ENTERED this the 7th day of February, 2011.


Summaries of

Cook v. McHugh

United States District Court, M.D. Tennessee, Nashville Division
Feb 8, 2011
No. 3:10-0643 (M.D. Tenn. Feb. 8, 2011)
Case details for

Cook v. McHugh

Case Details

Full title:CHARLES E. COOK, Plaintiff, v. JOHN McHUGH, SECRETARY OF THE ARMY…

Court:United States District Court, M.D. Tennessee, Nashville Division

Date published: Feb 8, 2011

Citations

No. 3:10-0643 (M.D. Tenn. Feb. 8, 2011)