Opinion
C. A. 9:23-cv-02919-SAL-MHC
10-15-2024
Andy Trinity Cook, Plaintiff, v. Sgt. M. Jinks, Ofc. C. Eagan, and Nurse L. Bell, Defendants.
ORDER
SHERRI A. LYDON, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Plaintiff Andy Trinity Cook filed this action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, asserting Defendants violated his rights under the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments. See ECF No. 1. This matter is before the court on the Report and Recommendation (the “Report”) issued by United States Magistrate Judge Molly H. Cherry, made in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and Local Civil Rule 73.02(B)(2) (D.S.C.), recommending that the court grant Defendant's motion for summary judgment. See ECF No. 42. Neither party filed objections to the Report and the time for doing so has expired.
The magistrate judge makes only a recommendation to this court. The recommendation has no presumptive weight, and the responsibility to make a final determination remains with this court. See Mathews v. Weber, 423 U.S. 261, 270-71 (1976). The court is charged with making a de novo determination of only those portions of the Report that have been specifically objected to, and the court may accept, reject, or modify the Report, in whole or in part. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). In the absence of objections, the court is not required to provide an explanation for adopting the Report and must “only satisfy itself that there is no clear error on the face of the record in order to accept the recommendation.” Diamond v. Colonial Life & Acc. Ins. Co., 416 F.3d 310, 315 (4th Cir. 2005) (citing Fed.R.Civ.P. 72 advisory committee's note).
After reviewing the Report, the applicable law, and the record of this case in accordance with the above standard, the court finds no clear error, adopts the Report, ECF No. 42, and incorporates it by reference herein. As a result, Defendants' motion for summary judgment, ECF No. 34, is GRANTED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.