From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cook v. Lundy

United States District Court, Central District of California
Feb 26, 2024
2:23-cv-01107-KK-BFM (C.D. Cal. Feb. 26, 2024)

Opinion

2:23-cv-01107-KK-BFM

02-26-2024

TAVNER COOK, Petitioner, v. L. LUNDY, Warden Respondent.


ORDER ACCEPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

HONORABLE KENLYKIYA KATO, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition, the records and files herein, the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, and Petitioner's Response to the Report and Recommendation. The Court accepts the recommendations of the Magistrate Judge.

ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED:

1. The Report and Recommendation is accepted.

2. Petitioner's stay-related motions (ECF 13-18) are denied.

3. Based on Petitioner's Response and his sworn declaration reflecting his intent to proceed only on Grounds Two and Three (ECF 36 at 3), Ground One of the Petition is dismissed without prejudice.

4. The action shall proceed on Grounds Two and Three only.

5. The Court Clerk shall serve this Order on all counsel or parties of record.


Summaries of

Cook v. Lundy

United States District Court, Central District of California
Feb 26, 2024
2:23-cv-01107-KK-BFM (C.D. Cal. Feb. 26, 2024)
Case details for

Cook v. Lundy

Case Details

Full title:TAVNER COOK, Petitioner, v. L. LUNDY, Warden Respondent.

Court:United States District Court, Central District of California

Date published: Feb 26, 2024

Citations

2:23-cv-01107-KK-BFM (C.D. Cal. Feb. 26, 2024)