From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cook v. Lingenfelter

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Dec 7, 2022
2:22-CV-01940-RFB-EJY (D. Nev. Dec. 7, 2022)

Opinion

2:22-CV-01940-RFB-EJY

12-07-2022

MICHAEL COOK, an individual, Plaintiff, v. ADAM LINGENFELTER, an individual; LINGENFELTER CUSTOM HOMES, LLC, a Texas limited liability company; DOES I-X; and ROE COMPANIES I-X; Defendants.

Jared Kahn, Esq. JK Legal & Consulting, LLC Attorneys for Plaintiff KOELLER NEBEKER CARLSON & HALUCK, LLP Mark F. Roach, Esq. Nevada Bar # 8237 Andrew C. Green, Esq. Nevada Bar # 9399 Attorneys for Defendants, ADAM LINGENFELTER and LINGENFELTER CUSTOM HOMES, LLC


Jared Kahn, Esq.

JK Legal & Consulting, LLC

Attorneys for Plaintiff

KOELLER NEBEKER CARLSON & HALUCK, LLP

Mark F. Roach, Esq. Nevada Bar # 8237

Andrew C. Green, Esq. Nevada Bar # 9399

Attorneys for Defendants, ADAM LINGENFELTER and LINGENFELTER CUSTOM HOMES, LLC

STIPULATION AND ORDER

RICHARD F. BOULWARE, II UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

COMES NOW, Plaintiff MICHAEL COOK (“Plaintiff”), by and through his attorneys, the law firm of JK LEGAL & CONSULTING, LLC, and comes now Defendants, ADAM LINGENFELTER and LINGENFELTER CUSTOM HOMES LLC (hereinafter referred to as “Defendants”), by and through their attorneys, the law firm of KOELLER, NEBEKER, CARLSON & HALUCK, LLP, hereby stipulate and agree as follows:

1. On November 23, 2022, Defendants filed their Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's [Complaint] (sic) Due to Lack of Personal Jurisdiction and Improper Venue, or in
the Alternative to Change Venue [ECF No. 5] (the “Motion”).
2. The current deadline to file an Opposition to the Motion is December 7, 2022.
3. The current deadline to file a Reply to the Opposition would be seven days thereafter.
4. Due to scheduling conflicts, the Parties agreed to extend the briefing deadlines for the Motion, as follows:
a. Plaintiff's deadline to file an Opposition to the Motion shall be and inclusive of December 30, 2022.
b. Defendants' deadline to file a Reply to the Opposition shall be and inclusive of January 13, 2023.

The parties agree this Stipulation and Order to extend the deadlines for the Motion is not undertaken for purposes of delay or in bad faith.

ORDER

The Court having reviewed the foregoing STIPULATION AND ORDER in the above-entitled matter and for good cause appearing therefor:

IT IS SO ORDERED that Plaintiff's Opposition to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's [Complaint] (sic) Due to Lack of Personal Jurisdiction and Improper Venue, or in the Alternative to Change Venue [ECF No. 5], which is currently due on December 7, 2022, will now be due on or before Friday, December 30, 2022.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED Defendants' Reply brief shall be due on or before January 13, 2023.


Summaries of

Cook v. Lingenfelter

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Dec 7, 2022
2:22-CV-01940-RFB-EJY (D. Nev. Dec. 7, 2022)
Case details for

Cook v. Lingenfelter

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL COOK, an individual, Plaintiff, v. ADAM LINGENFELTER, an…

Court:United States District Court, District of Nevada

Date published: Dec 7, 2022

Citations

2:22-CV-01940-RFB-EJY (D. Nev. Dec. 7, 2022)