Cook v. Hall

2 Citing cases

  1. Edwin Smith, L.L.C. v. Synergy Operating, L.L.C.

    285 P.3d 656 (N.M. 2012)   Cited 2 times

    There too, the statute eliminated previously-available methods of ending a joint tenancy. See Cook v. Hall, 18 Neb.App. 168, 778 N.W.2d 744, 750 (2009) (explaining that statute likely abrogated a prior state supreme court decision, Hughes v. de Barberi, 171 Neb. 780, 107 N.W.2d 747 (1961), which held that a contract to sell real estate effected termination). Our Legislature has not to date followed such an approach.

  2. Sec. State Bank v. Bopp

    No. A-12-648 (Neb. Ct. App. May. 14, 2013)   Cited 1 times

    After a movant for summary judgment has shown facts entitling the movant to judgment as a matter of law, the opposing party has the burden to present evidence showing an issue of material fact which prevents judgment as a matter of law for the moving party. Cook v. Hall, 18 Neb. App. 168, 778 N.W.2d 744 (2009). In attempting to meet its burden, the Bopps presented affidavits from each of them individually, as well as the quitclaim deed.