From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cook v. Deltona Corporation

United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit
Jun 12, 1985
763 F.2d 398 (11th Cir. 1985)

Opinion

No. 83-5651.

June 12, 1985.

Joseph Mancilla, Jr., Miami, Fla., for defendants-appellants/cross-appellees.

Robert F. Childs, Jr., Birmingham, Ala., for plaintiff-appellee/cross-appellant.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida.

Before GODBOLD, Chief Judge, HILL, Circuit Judge, and PECK, Senior Circuit Judge.

Honorable John W. Peck, U.S. Circuit Judge for the Sixth Circuit, sitting by designation.


ON PETITION FOR REHEARING [2] (Opinion February 27, 1985, 11 Cir., 1985, 753 F.2d 1552).


On petition for rehearing appellee/cross-appellant Wendell Cook notes that the panel failed to address his contention that the district court abused discretion in refusing to award Cook expert witness costs of $2,474.86. Addressing this issue, we find that the judgment of the district court denying expert witness costs was not abuse of discretion and affirm that judgment. See J. Moore, W. Taggart J. Wicker, Moore's Federal Practice ¶ 54.77 [5.-3] (2d ed. 1983).

Excepting only the foregoing, IT IS ORDERED that the petition for rehearing filed in the above entitled and numbered cause be and the same is hereby

DENIED.


Summaries of

Cook v. Deltona Corporation

United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit
Jun 12, 1985
763 F.2d 398 (11th Cir. 1985)
Case details for

Cook v. Deltona Corporation

Case Details

Full title:WENDELL COOK, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE/CROSS-APPELLANT, v. THE DELTONA…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit

Date published: Jun 12, 1985

Citations

763 F.2d 398 (11th Cir. 1985)

Citing Cases

Armbrister v. Roland Intern. Corp.

As the Eleventh Circuit put it, the doctrine of equitable estoppel applies when a plaintiff fully ". . .…

Yeomans v. Le Triomphe Partnership

We agree with the district court that the above regulation refutes appellants' argument that "sale" in…