From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cook v. Cook Bros., Inc.

FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA
Jan 29, 2020
288 So. 3d 1274 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2020)

Opinion

No. 1D20-0025

01-29-2020

S. Lamont COOK, as officer, director and shareholder of Cook Brothers, Inc., a Florida for profit corporation, Petitioner, v. COOK BROTHERS, INC., a Florida for Profit Corporation, and L. Finley Cook, as an officer, director and shareholder of Cook Brothers, Inc., a Florida corporation, Respondents.

Robert J. Sniffen and Mark K. Logan of Sniffen & Spellman, P.A., Tallahassee, for Petitioner. No appearance for Respondents.


Robert J. Sniffen and Mark K. Logan of Sniffen & Spellman, P.A., Tallahassee, for Petitioner.

No appearance for Respondents.

Per Curiam.

The petition for writ of prohibition is denied as legally insufficient. Petitioner failed to satisfy the requirements of Florida Rule of Judicial Administration 2.330 at the trial court level.

Lewis, Winokur, and M.K. Thomas, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Cook v. Cook Bros., Inc.

FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA
Jan 29, 2020
288 So. 3d 1274 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2020)
Case details for

Cook v. Cook Bros., Inc.

Case Details

Full title:S. LAMONT COOK, as officer, director and shareholder of Cook Brothers…

Court:FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA

Date published: Jan 29, 2020

Citations

288 So. 3d 1274 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2020)