Cook v. Bruss

1 Citing case

  1. Revard v. Py-ah-hun-kah

    42 P.2d 838 (Okla. 1935)   Cited 1 times

    Neither is there any merit in defendant's contention that the action is barred by the statute of limitations because the time for filing the action expired subsequent to the date of the filing of the petition and prior to the date of the amendment. Cook v. Bruss, 167 Okla. 466, 30 P.2d 686, and cases therein cited. Defendant contends that the judgment upon which the claim is based is void on its face, citing Hovey v. Elliott, 167 U.S. 409. 42 L.Ed. 215, 17 S.Ct. Rep. 841. The pertinent provisions of the journal entry of final judgment are as follows: