From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cook v. Bridgecrest Credit Co.

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Oct 6, 2022
2:22-cv-01141-CDS-NJK (D. Nev. Oct. 6, 2022)

Opinion

2:22-cv-01141-CDS-NJK

10-06-2022

Douglas Cook, Plaintiff, v. Bridgecrest Credit Company, LLC, Defendants.


ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO STAY AND COMPEL ARBITRATION [ECF No. 10]

Cristina D. Silva United States District Judge

Defendant Bridgecrest Credit Company, LLC moved to stay this case and compel arbitration in accordance with the terms of the arbitration agreement entered into by the parties in June of 2017. ECF No. 10. Plaintiff Douglas Cook filed a notice of non-opposition to the motion, voluntarily agreeing to arbitrate. ECF No. 12. Cook does not oppose staying the case and anticipates commencing an arbitration proceeding within 30 days. Id.

For the foregoing reasons, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that defendant's unopposed Motion to Stay and Compel Arbitration (ECF No. 10) is GRANTED. This matter is STAYED pending arbitration of plaintiff's claims. Any pending deadlines are vacated.

The parties shall submit all claims asserted in the complaint to arbitration in accordance with the arbitration agreement.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Cook v. Bridgecrest Credit Co.

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Oct 6, 2022
2:22-cv-01141-CDS-NJK (D. Nev. Oct. 6, 2022)
Case details for

Cook v. Bridgecrest Credit Co.

Case Details

Full title:Douglas Cook, Plaintiff, v. Bridgecrest Credit Company, LLC, Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, District of Nevada

Date published: Oct 6, 2022

Citations

2:22-cv-01141-CDS-NJK (D. Nev. Oct. 6, 2022)