From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Coogan v. Kramer

Appellate Term of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Sep 22, 2004
2004 N.Y. Slip Op. 51071 (N.Y. App. Term 2004)

Opinion

2004-96 NC.

Decided September 22, 2004.

Appeal by plaintiff from a small claims judgment of the District Court, Nassau County (S. Pardes, J.), entered July 23, 2003, in favor of defendants dismissing the action.

Judgment unanimously affirmed without costs.

PRESENT: McCABE, P.J., COVELLO and TANENBAUM, JJ.


In this small claims action, plaintiff seeks to recover the cost of vacation vouchers she purchased from defendants, claiming that she did not receive sufficient disclosure regarding blackout dates which restricted the use of the vouchers. A review of the small claims trial indicates that substantial justice was done between the parties according to the rules and principles of substantive law ( see UDCA 1807; Moses v. Randolph, 236 AD2d 706, 707). We note that the lower court did not abuse its discretion in granting defendants' motion to vacate a judgment previously entered on default as defendants' moving papers established both an excusable default and a meritorious defense ( see Berry v. Aquila Realty Co., 6 AD3d 563).


Summaries of

Coogan v. Kramer

Appellate Term of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Sep 22, 2004
2004 N.Y. Slip Op. 51071 (N.Y. App. Term 2004)
Case details for

Coogan v. Kramer

Case Details

Full title:TATIANA I. COOGAN, D/B/A CENTRAL TRANSMISSIONS AUTOMOTIVE INC., Appellant…

Court:Appellate Term of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Sep 22, 2004

Citations

2004 N.Y. Slip Op. 51071 (N.Y. App. Term 2004)