From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Controlled Weather of Penn. v. Contel Constr

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Oct 23, 1969
33 A.D.2d 547 (N.Y. App. Div. 1969)

Opinion

October 23, 1969


Order entered February 17, 1969, unanimously affirmed, without costs and without disbursements. Inasmuch as the defendant Aetna Casualty and Surety Co. has stipulated to become a party to the Pennsylvania action and the plaintiff may obtain full relief in such action, we are affirming the dismissal of this action brought subsequently in this State. The circumstances justify the dismissal and a pendency of this action, with a stay thereof, is not required for the protection of the rights of the plaintiff.

Concur — Stevens, P.J., Eager, Tilzer, McNally and Bastow, JJ.


Summaries of

Controlled Weather of Penn. v. Contel Constr

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Oct 23, 1969
33 A.D.2d 547 (N.Y. App. Div. 1969)
Case details for

Controlled Weather of Penn. v. Contel Constr

Case Details

Full title:CONTROLLED WEATHER OF PENN. CORP., Also Known as CONTROLLED WEATHER CORP…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Oct 23, 1969

Citations

33 A.D.2d 547 (N.Y. App. Div. 1969)