From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Control Solutions, Inc. v. MicroDAQ.com, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON
Aug 24, 2015
No. 3:15-cv-00748-PK (D. Or. Aug. 24, 2015)

Opinion

No. 3:15-cv-00748-PK

08-24-2015

CONTROL SOLUTIONS, INC., Plaintiff, v. MICRODAQ.COM, INC., and DOES 1-10, Defendants.


ORDER :

Magistrate Judge Papak issued a Findings and Recommendation [27] on July 30, 2015, in which he recommends that this Court grant Defendants' Motion to Dismiss [17] Plaintiff's complaint for lack of personal jurisdiction. The matter is now before me pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b).

Because no objections to the Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendation were timely filed, I am relieved of my obligation to review the record de novo. United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) (en banc); see also United States v. Bernhardt, 840 F.2d 1441, 1444 (9th Cir. 1988) (de novo review required only for portions of Magistrate Judge's report to which objections have been made). Having reviewed the legal principles de novo, I find no error.

CONCLUSION

The Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Papak's Findings & Recommendation [27], and therefore, Defendant's Motion to Dismiss [17] Plaintiff's complaint is granted.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED this 24 day of August, 2015.

/s/_________

MARCO A. HERNÁNDEZ

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Control Solutions, Inc. v. MicroDAQ.com, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON
Aug 24, 2015
No. 3:15-cv-00748-PK (D. Or. Aug. 24, 2015)
Case details for

Control Solutions, Inc. v. MicroDAQ.com, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:CONTROL SOLUTIONS, INC., Plaintiff, v. MICRODAQ.COM, INC., and DOES 1-10…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

Date published: Aug 24, 2015

Citations

No. 3:15-cv-00748-PK (D. Or. Aug. 24, 2015)