Opinion
CASE NO. 1:06-cv-01817-LJO-SKO PC
09-27-2011
MICHAEL CONTRERAZ, Plaintiff, v. J. STOCKBRIDGE, et al., Defendants.
ORDER REQUIRING DEFENDANT CAROLS
TO RESPOND TO AMENDED COMPLAINT
(Doc. 80)
TEN-DAY DEADLINE
Plaintiff Michael Contreraz, a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, filed this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 on December 14, 2006. This action is proceeding on Plaintiff's amended complaint, filed on February 3, 2009, against Defendants Stockbridge, Rodriguez, Franco, Davis, and Carlos. Defendant Carlos waived service of the summons and amended complaint and his response was due on or before September 22, 2011.
Defendant Stockbridge is also known as Defendant Cota, and she along with Defendants Rodriguez and Franco have answered the amended complaint. Service was returned un-executed as to Defendant Davis, however. The Court will determine the appropriate course of action regarding Defendant Davis and it will issue a separate order in due course.
Accordingly, Defendant Carlos shall file a response within ten (10) days from the date of service of this order or default will be entered against him.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Sheila K. Oberto
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE