From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Contreras v. State

State of Texas in the Eleventh Court of Appeals
Jan 30, 2014
No. 11-13-00230-CR (Tex. App. Jan. 30, 2014)

Opinion

No. 11-13-00230-CR

01-30-2014

JOSE GUADALUPE CONTRERAS, JR., Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee


On Appeal from the 106th District Court

Gaines County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 12-4279


MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant, Jose Guadalupe Contreras, Jr., entered an open plea of guilty to the charged offense of felony driving while intoxicated and a plea of true to the enhancement allegations. The trial court accepted Appellant's plea, convicted him of the offense, and assessed his punishment at confinement for twenty years. We dismiss the appeal.

Appellant's court-appointed counsel has filed a motion to withdraw. The motion is supported by a brief in which counsel professionally and conscientiously examines the record and applicable law and states that he has concluded that the appeal is frivolous. Counsel has provided Appellant with a copy of the brief and advised Appellant of his right to review the record and file a response to counsel's brief. A response has not been filed. Court-appointed counsel has complied with the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967); In re Schulman, 252 S.W.3d 403 (Tex. Crim. App. 2008); Stafford v. State, 813 S.W.2d 503 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991); High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807 (Tex. Crim. App. 1978); Currie v. State, 516 S.W.2d 684 (Tex. Crim. App. 1974); Gainous v. State, 436 S.W.2d 137 (Tex. Crim. App. 1969); and Eaden v. State, 161 S.W.3d 173 (Tex. App.—Eastland 2005, no pet.). Following the procedures outlined in Anders and Schulman, we have independently reviewed the record, and we agree that the appeal is without merit and should be dismissed. Schulman, 252 S.W.3d at 409.

This court granted a motion for extension of time filed by counsel and gave Appellant thirty days in which to exercise his right to file a response to counsel's brief.

We note that counsel has the responsibility to advise Appellant that he may file a petition for discretionary review with the clerk of the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals seeking review by that court. TEX. R. APP. P. 48.4 ("In criminal cases, the attorney representing the defendant on appeal shall, within five days after the opinion is handed down, send his client a copy of the opinion and judgment, along with notification of the defendant's right to file a pro se petition for discretionary review under Rule 68."). Likewise, this court advises Appellant that he may file a petition for discretionary review pursuant to TEX. R. APP. P. 68.

The motion to withdraw is granted, and the appeal is dismissed.

PER CURIAM Do not publish. See TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b). Panel consists of: Wright, C.J.,
Willson, J., and Bailey, J.


Summaries of

Contreras v. State

State of Texas in the Eleventh Court of Appeals
Jan 30, 2014
No. 11-13-00230-CR (Tex. App. Jan. 30, 2014)
Case details for

Contreras v. State

Case Details

Full title:JOSE GUADALUPE CONTRERAS, JR., Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

Court:State of Texas in the Eleventh Court of Appeals

Date published: Jan 30, 2014

Citations

No. 11-13-00230-CR (Tex. App. Jan. 30, 2014)