From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Contreras v. Bank of America

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Nov 17, 2011
No. C 11-00068 CRB (N.D. Cal. Nov. 17, 2011)

Opinion

No. C 11-00068 CRB

11-17-2011

JOSE CONTRERAS, Plaintiff, v. BANK OF AMERICA, ET AL, Defendant.


ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

Plaintiff filed this action in January 2011. Dkt. 1. Judge Fogel granted Defendants' Motion to Dismiss on August 23, 2011 and ordered that Plaintiff amend the Complaint within thirty days. Dkt. 24. Plaintiff failed to file an amended complaint. On October 18, 2011, Defendants filed a Motion to Dismiss for failure to prosecute pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b) due to Plaintiff's failure to file an amended complaint. Dkt. 30. As of this date, Plaintiff has not yet filed an amended complaint, nor has Plaintiff filed an opposition brief to the motion to dismiss. Accordingly, Plaintiff is ORDERED to show cause why his case should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). Plaintiff shall file his response to this Order, along with any materials he would like the Court to consider in ruling on Defendants' motion, by Monday, November 28, 2011 at 4:00 p,m. Failure to respond to this Order could result in the dismissal of Plaintiff's case.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

CHARLES R. BREYER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Contreras v. Bank of America

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Nov 17, 2011
No. C 11-00068 CRB (N.D. Cal. Nov. 17, 2011)
Case details for

Contreras v. Bank of America

Case Details

Full title:JOSE CONTRERAS, Plaintiff, v. BANK OF AMERICA, ET AL, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Nov 17, 2011

Citations

No. C 11-00068 CRB (N.D. Cal. Nov. 17, 2011)